DR. STEWART CUSTER
ANSWERED
ON THE T. R. & K.J.V.

[...]

By Rev. D. A. Waite, Th.D., Ph.D.

#1251

FEBRUARY 28, 1985

"AN ANSWER TO STEWART CUSTER'S BOOKLET,
'THE TRUTH ABOUT THE KJV CONTROVERSY'"

COMPLETE REPORT

By:

Rev. D. A. Waite, Th.D., Ph.D.

**********

#1251

...
1984 ...

a. Dean Burgon Society Articles of Faith. pp. 2-3a.

b. Other Faithful Foreign Language Translations are the Word of God
Also
. pp. 3b.

(1) Erasmus Had Samples of.... p. 14a.

(2) The KJV Translation Had Samples of.... p. 14b.

15

(3) Erasmus and His Greek Text.

(a) Guide to Textual Criticism, by [Edward] Miller.

(b) Which Bible, by [David O.] Fuller.

Harold Lindsell's Two Books Clearly Highlight the Errors of
"Limited Inerrancy." p. 31.
[HL was a SB.]

a. Proper Underlying Texts are Vital to Proper Translations. p. 42.

43

b. The Westcott & Hort N.T. Text Differs from the Received Text
Over 5000 Times
.

c. The O.T. Critical Texts Differ from the Masoretic Received Text
Over 20,000 Times
.

b. Custer's View Incorrect.

(1) "Trans-
lators REVIVED..."
by Alexander W. McClure; written about 1857, p. 44.

(2) Henry Savile; (3) John Harmar. p. 44.

(4) John Spencer; (5) William Dakins; (6) John Bois. p. 45.

(1) The Alexandrian Text is not "Older" than the Traditional Text. p. 49a.

(2) The Alexandrian Text is not "Better Attested" Than the Tradi-
tional Text
. p. 49b.

a. Why the "Textus Receptus" Did Not Begin with Erasmus. p. 72.

(a) The Trinitarian Bible Society's Account of the History of
the "Textus Receptus
." pp. 72b-74a.

(b) Dean Burgon's Account of the History of the "T. R." or the "Traditional Text." p. 74b.

b. The KJV of 1611 was not Based on Erasmus' Greet Text, but on Beza's
1598 Edition
. p. 89.

d. The Text of I John 5:7. p. 93a.

27. SHOULD ACTS 8:37 BE REMOVED FROM THE BIBLE? [Never] p. 93b.

c. God Has Promised To Preserve His Word. p. 96.

d. The "Textual Experts" are in Error About the Genuineness of Mark
16:9-20, and Can't be Trusted. p. 97.

e. The "Textual Experts" are in Error About the Genuineness of "God"
in I Timothy 3:16, and Can't be Trusted.

Greek Septuagint (LXX) pp. 98-106a.

b. The Septuagint is Entirely Inaccurate in Many Books and the Text
is in a State of Serious Corruption
. p. 101.

37. WHAT IS THE DATE OF THE SYRIAC PESHITTA? pp. 106b-112b.

b. Proof for a 2nd Century Date for the Peshitta from Burgon's REVISION
REVISED
.

Westcott & Hort heresies pp. 114-150a.

b. Westcott and Hort's Theory and Greek New Testament Text are Both
Invalid
. p. 150b.

c. Burgon's Summary of the Erroneous Work of Westcott and Hort from
Revision Revised. p. 150c.

d. Dean John William Burgon's 84 Remarks Against the Erroneous Greek
Text of Westcott and Hort. pp. 152b-175.

60. IS THE NASV A "GOOD TRANSLATION"? pp. 177b-178a.

a. Some of the Departures of the NASV from
the Masoretic Hebrew Text. p. 178b.

c. The NASV Is Not "The Word of God" in English, and Cannot be Trusted. p. 180b.

III. CONCLUDING REMARKS p. 181b.

B. Dr. Custer's Position is an Erroneous One.

C. Not an Attack on Bob Jones University.

[Book Review: DAW denies "inspiration" for the KJV on pp. 80- 82, 89 & 95-96.
CHM note: We believe that the KJV (1769) is the most accurate English translation.]